I watched Er Chuang’s short video, and everything went numb!

[In modern society, the growth of a country is no longer the land area of ​​the feudal period, but the level of science and technology. ]

[Whoever can innovate in science and technology can enhance vitality. ]

[And the external risk has also changed from physical invasion to a comprehensive competition for discourse power and influence in the trade market. ]

[Based on this standard, nowadays, Longguo and Yingjiangguo are undoubtedly the most powerful countries in the world, there is no doubt about it. ]

[And there are still some countries immersed in the feudal era, and they have not come out of the inertia of thinking to covet other people's land. ]

[Such a country will eventually be left behind by the times and disappear in the torrent of history. ]

……

Looking at the last part of the video.

Many emperors of all dynasties nodded.

According to the later situation they learned from many previous videos, it is indeed the case.

In the competition between countries, occupying land is no longer the main goal.

……

On the giant screen in the sky.

The video has finished playing.

Immediately afterwards.

The video is refreshed.

A new video appears.

[Why do Western politicians hope that Longguo will abolish the death penalty? What is the real plot? Are they really saints and living bodhisattvas? ]

……

Looking at the title of this new video, many ancient people from all dynasties instantly became very interested in the content of the following video.

They have already learned about the issue of abolishing the death penalty in a previous video.

They know that some Western countries in later generations have abolished the death penalty, and even if they deliberately killed many people, they will not be sentenced to death.

Even in some countries, murderers can still enjoy a good life in a seven-star prison.

When seeing that video, many ancient people felt it was magical and were very curious about the issue of "abolishing the death penalty".

Why would those Western countries in later generations do that?

However, in that video, there was no in-depth analysis of the issue of "abolishing the death penalty".

The people of Dragon Country in later generations simply mocked those Westerners who demanded "abolishing the death penalty" as "white left saints".

Therefore.

Seeing this new video on the giant screen that will analyze the issue of "abolishing the death penalty" in depth, many ancient people were naturally very interested.

……

[At the United Nations Human Rights Council meeting a few days ago. ]

[The representatives of our Dragon Country, under the watchful eyes of the world, criticized the draft resolution on "the issue of the death penalty" jointly proposed by more than 50 countries, and then voted against it. ]

[The content of this draft can be summarized into the following points. ]

[First, the death penalty is identified as a violation of human rights. ]

[Second, call on all countries to abolish the death penalty. ]

[Third, countries that have not yet abolished the death penalty should ensure that all death penalty sentences comply with international practices, ensure openness and transparency, and provide case information for global supervision. 】

……

"Hmph! It's pure nonsense!"

In the Hongwu plane of the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Yuanzhang snorted coldly.

As one of the ancient emperors who was best at sentencing people to death and inventing different death penalty methods, he certainly did not agree with the abolition of the death penalty at all.

In his opinion, those who are sentenced to death are all extremely evil people and deserve to die!

……

[In the explanatory speech before the vote, our representative clearly stated the reasons for his opposition. ]

[Abolition of the death penalty is not a consensus of the whole world. Everyone has their own national conditions and considerations. Whether to abolish the death penalty or not should be respected. ]

[This is the judicial sovereignty of each country, and outsiders are not allowed to interfere. ]

……

"That's right!"

Many ancient people in all dynasties agreed with the Dragon Country representative's point of view.

The laws of each country are formulated by each country according to its own national conditions. What does it have to do with other countries?

……

[However, in the vote, 29 countries were in favor, only 12 were against, and another five countries abstained. ]

[Because the veto power of the five permanent members is only used in the Security Council, not the Human Rights Council. ]

[Therefore, this draft was passed because of the majority approval. ]

[Not only is our country a minority in the meeting, but looking at the whole world, there are also few countries that retain the death penalty. ]

[As of 2017, 106 countries in the world have completely abolished the death penalty through legislation, and 7 countries have abolished the death penalty in principle, and can only execute it in very rare cases. ]

[Although 29 countries have retained the death penalty in name, they no longer execute it in fact. ]

[There are only 56 countries that still sentence the death penalty and actually execute it. ]

[These countries are basically concentrated in Asia and East Africa, plus an American country called Eagle Sauce. 】

……

Seeing these numbers.

Many ancient people in all dynasties were shocked.

Although they had learned from the previous video that some Western countries had abolished the death penalty.

However, they never expected that so many countries in later generations would abolish the death penalty.

Of the nearly 200 countries in the world in later generations, only 56 countries still retain the death penalty. This proportion is too small.

Doesn't this mean that in the future earth, "abolishing the death penalty" is the general trend?

"Why is this so?"

Many ancient people were full of confusion.

Without the death penalty, how to punish those who are extremely evil?

They originally thought that the magical situation of "killing without paying for life" in the previous video only existed in a few Western countries.

Unexpectedly, it was a common phenomenon in later generations.

In the eyes of these ancient people, this was too outrageous.

They just couldn’t understand it.

……

[The abolitionist countries, with Europe as the core, have beenSix years to date, using their advantage in votes, they have passed resolutions at the United Nations more than a dozen times, calling on other countries to abolish the death penalty. 】

[To put it bluntly, they are using the United Nations to put pressure on other countries. 】

[And our Dragon Country is basically indifferent. You can call as you like, but the death penalty has not been truly abolished until now. 】

[This phenomenon is very interesting. 】

[Our death row prisoners have no relationship with Western politicians. Why are they so concerned and calling loudly again and again to save these people's lives? 】

……

Hearing this question.

Many ancient people in all dynasties also felt strange in their hearts.

Why did those Western politicians do this?

The plane of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty.

Liu Che looked at the high-altitude plane with a thoughtful look in his eyes.

In his opinion, these Western politicians are so persistent in getting Longguo to abolish the death penalty, it must not be simply because of "good heart" or "protecting human rights".

Among them, most of them have other plans.

As a person who is proficient in the means of power struggle, he smelled the smell of conspiracy.

"If Longguo abolishes the death penalty, will there be any adverse consequences?"

While thinking, Liu Che continued to look at the giant screen in the sky.

……

[To understand this issue, we must first talk about where the trend of "abolishing the death penalty" came from? ]

[The systematic theory of abolishing the death penalty was born in the 18th century and was proposed by Italian jurist Beccaria. ]

[He summarized several reasons why the death penalty must be abolished, the most important point is: the state has no right to deprive citizens of their lives. ]

[Most countries have laws prohibiting killing to protect the right to life, but the state will kill people through the death penalty. Isn't it contradictory? 】

【This is an act of human rights violation. 】

……

Spring and Autumn and Warring States plane.

As one of the main representatives of the Legalists, Shang Yang looked at the huge screen in the sky and shook his head:

"Nonsense, nonsense!"

He, the so-called Italian jurist Beccaria, completely disagreed with this view, or rather, firmly opposed it.

This is not surprising.

For Shang Yang, who would treat the Qin State as consumables, human rights and the like do not exist.

What "the state has no right to deprive citizens of their lives" is nonsense in Shang Yang's eyes, misleading the public!

……

【Beccaria also proposed that in judicial practice, it is impossible to completely avoid false and wrongful convictions, and once a wrongful killing is made, it cannot be corrected. 】

[The deterrent effect of the death penalty is redundant, because as long as the consequences of the punishment are greater than the benefits of the crime, it is enough to deter crime. 】

[And the execution of the death penalty itself is a violent act, which may encourage people to fight violence with violence, which is not conducive to the development of civilization. 】

[Even if the death penalty is executed, the consequences caused by the criminal and the lives taken are irreversible, but it is meaningless.righteousness and sacrifice another life. 】

…

Spring and Autumn and Warring States plane.

Gong Yanggao, the founder of the Gongyang School of Confucianism, snorted coldly:

"Absolutely absurd!"

These views on the giant screen are in great conflict with the "great revenge" theory advocated by their Gongyang School, so he naturally would not agree.

The Gongyang School emphasizes "Can revenge be taken after nine generations? Even after a hundred generations."

Even, "Serving the monarch is like serving the father, so how can revenge be taken? It is said: If the father is not executed, the son can take revenge. If the father is executed, the son can take revenge, which is the way of pushing the blade."

That is to say: if the father is guilty and executed, the minister cannot seek revenge from the monarch. But if the father is innocent and killed, his son, although a minister, can also seek revenge from the monarch.

If the monarch is unjust, the relationship between the monarch and the minister will naturally be dissolved, and such a bastard emperor can certainly be killed at will.

Therefore, Gong Yanggao felt that it was reasonable for a minister to seek revenge on his monarch. He naturally felt that "fighting violence with violence" was reasonable and worth promoting.

……

[Although Beccaria is a respected master in the legal community and many scholars support his theory of abolishing the death penalty, his statement is not entirely correct. ]

[Those who oppose "abolishing the death penalty" believe that prohibiting killing and executing the death penalty do not conflict. ] (To read violent novels, go to Feilu Novel Network!)

[What the law prohibits is that individuals kill at will according to their own preferences, while the death penalty is executed after trial according to the law. ]

[As long as the judicial system is fair enough, there will be no problem of indiscriminate killing. ]

[Moreover, each criminal has different ideas. Some people are afraid of death but not afraid of living in prison. Don't take it for granted that life imprisonment is a better punishment. ]

[Although the death penalty cannot save the victim, it is a psychological compensation for the family members and the general public. 】

【If a person who has committed a heinous crime ends his life, it will give everyone some comfort. 】

……

Many ancient people in all dynasties nodded in agreement.

Repaying evil with good, how to repay good?

Killing someone for a life, revenge, it is natural!

If a criminal who has committed a heinous crime does not die, not only will the victim's family be unable to accept it, I am afraid that even the victim in the underworld will not be able to rest in peace.

……

【In two completely different theories, Longguo chose to retain the death penalty because our traditional culture has the view of killing someone for a life. 】

【In many public opinion surveys in the past, those who support retaining the death penalty are the majority. 】

【In 2004, in a survey conducted by Wuhan University, only 11.3% of the respondents supported "abolishing the death penalty." 】

【In 2008, a survey initiated by Didu University showed that only 14% of the respondents supported "abolishing the death penalty." 】

……

"As expected of our Chinese lineage, the Dragon people of later generations are indeed sensible."

Many ancient people from all dynasties sighed in their hearts.

They are also firmly opposed to "abolishing the death penalty."

……[]

【Unlike our Dragon Country, most European countries have chosen to "abolish the death penalty." 】

【Because the 18th century, when the "abolition of the death penalty" doctrine was born, was the era when Europe was transforming from feudal monarchy to bourgeois democracy. 】

【Because European monarchs often used the death penalty to punish rebels or dissidents at will. 】

【Therefore, the Revolutionary Party regarded the death penalty as a tool for the monarch to maintain brutal rule, so they supported the "abolition of the death penalty" doctrine. 】

【In addition, "abolition of the death penalty" is also in line with the teachings of European religions. 】

【As everyone knows, Europeans generally believe in JDJ, and there are ten commandments in the highest book of JDJ, and the sixth commandment is: "Thou shalt not kill." 】

【Therefore, after the European bourgeoisie came to power, in order to show that they defend human rights, religious spirit and Western values, they all supported "abolition of the death penalty." 】

【After the end of World War II, several major European countries completed the "abolition of the death penalty" legislation one after another. 】

【The European Union, which was established later, even made "abolishing the death penalty" one of the criteria for joining the EU. 】

……

"So that's it."

In the dimension of Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, Li Shimin suddenly realized.

So this is the root cause of "abolishing the death penalty" in Western countries.

In essence, it stems from the need for political struggle.

Even if it is so-called catering to the doctrine of JDJ, it is essentially for the European bourgeoisie to win the support of religious forces.

……

【Originally, you choose yours, I choose mine, and we don't interfere with each other. 】

【However, these European politicians are not satisfied with entertaining themselves. 】

【They also want to use the issue of "abolishing the death penalty" to seize the moral high ground and attack other countries. 】

【To put it simply, I was the first to abolish the death penalty, so my system is more advanced and more civilized. You have not abolished the death penalty, so you are a barbaric, brutal, and uncivilized country. 】

……

“Sure enough, they are harboring evil intentions!”

In the dimension of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Liu Che saw this and instantly understood the Western politicians’ persistent plan to abolish the death penalty in Longguo.

On the surface, it seems to be a so-called “human rights” issue, but in fact it is an ideological confrontation.

After the disintegration of Big Brother, Longguo in later generations was the biggest banner of the red ideological country.

And the issue of “abolishing the death penalty” is a weapon used by Western politicians to attack Longguo ideologically.

If Longguo “abolishes the death penalty” as required by Western politicians.

Western politicians will inevitably use this as a reason to advocate that this proves that Western capitalist ideology is superior to Longguo’s red ideology.

And if Longguo refuses to “abolish the death penalty”.

Western politicians (Zhao) can always use this as a reason to wield the moral stick, carry out continuous ideological attacks on Longguo, and slander Longguo all the time.

In short, it’s not a loss anyway.

"The intention is really sinister."

Liu Che sighed in his heart.

……

[Big Brother encountered this situation. ]

[At the beginning of the Cold War, Europe portrayed Big Brother as a brutal and terrifying red empire, whoever the leader said would be killed. ]

[Compared with itself, there is not even the death penalty, a real paradise of freedom. ]

[In order to wash away the bad reputation and prove the superiority of the system, Big Brother announced the abolition of the death penalty in 1947. ]

[As a result, European politicians did not stop smearing Big Brother. ]

[Because of the abolition of the death penalty, more and more reactionary forces and murderers appeared in Big Brother. ]

[Only three years later, Big Brother regretted it and re-enabled the death penalty for traitors and spies. ]

[Five years later, Big Brother re-enables the death penalty for intentional homicide. ]

[This is equivalent to a toss in vain. 】

……

The plane of Emperor Chengzu of the Ming Dynasty.

Zhu Di shook his head.

This move of Big Brother was obviously a miscalculation.

When the two sides are fighting, how can they follow the rules set by the enemy?

According to the people of later generations, the rules set by others are in the hands of others, how can you win?

Besides, the "abolition of the death penalty" itself is wrong.

Those who have committed heinous crimes do not deserve to live in the world, and they must be killed!

Moreover, without the deterrence of the death penalty, many daring people will become more unscrupulous.

……

[Now, the purpose of the drama performed by the abolitionist countries in the United Nations is the same. 】

[They don't care about the life and death of those death row prisoners at all, they just want to find ways to disgust other countries, that's all. 【目】

……

Many ancient people in all dynasties nodded slightly.

Seeing this, they naturally understood.

The so-called "protecting human rights" and other reasons are just a cover for Western politicians to achieve their own political goals. .