Entertainment: Start with Succubus and play Hollywood

On the day the debate ended, Hillary became famous.

Not because of her wonderful speech in the debate, but because of that big eye roll.

Her action of slightly shaking her head and rolling her eyes was made into various emoticons by netizens, appearing on major forums and community websites, causing a lot of joy.

Trump quickly followed suit.

That night, he posted a GIF on his Twitter.

In the GIF, Hillary rolled her eyes, and below was a line of English sentences flashing with golden light: "Hillary, I despise you."

Then there was another GIF, this time it was Trump's own eye roll, and below it was a sentence: "I can't stand it anymore."

Trump's follow-up immediately made the Internet's funny people find their base camp, so a lot of Hillary's GIFs were posted under the dynamics of that day, and in less than two hours, the number of replies of "767" exceeded 30,000.

Hillary was very angry.

As a veteran politician, she doesn't know how to laugh at herself or make a fool of herself.

She said with disgust that this behavior was very immoral.

So the next day, she publicly condemned this behavior and called Trump and the group of "Trump supporters"

"a group of deplorables."

This wording was inappropriate and not elegant, and it was quickly criticized.

Hillary then apologized for this comment.

But Hillary was not wrong.

Trump's style destined that many of his supporters were rednecks with low education.

These people have little culture, racial discrimination, do not understand the world, are arrogant, and do not respect women... Well, it seems to be a good match for Trump.

(PS: No matter how much the US brags, there is one fact: among developed countries, Americans rank very low in literacy, common sense and scientific cognition. China, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands and Russia all score much higher than the US. The main reason is that American education is too dependent on the market: so the rich receive better elite education, and ordinary people without connections can only receive "happy education".)

Currently, the voting situation in the whole of America is:

Hillary Clinton attracted more educated urban voters, who claim to be elites and used to be supporters of the Republican Party.

Trump mainly attracted less educated redneck whites, whose ancestors were often coal miners or industrial workers who supported the Democratic Party.

And now, because of the propaganda strategies of Hillary Clinton and Trump that are opposite to the party tone, the attributes of voters on both sides have also changed.

In Martin's private words, although Trump has received higher education, his deliberate arrogance and ignorance in this election makes it easier for a large number of people whose knowledge of the world is as poor as his to believe him.

In fact, he does benefit from flaunting his ignorance.

"This propaganda strategy is great because TrumpIf Trump competes with Hillary for the support of the elites, he is doomed to lose, so it is better to find another way. "Martin said.

In fact, many people have discovered that many of Trump's supporters are not interested in rational views - in their view, this is what liberal villains care about.

They think emotions are more important, and in the United States and other countries, the main emotions manipulated by demagogues are fear, resentment and distrust, and Trump has successfully used this.

Well, isn't it a bit like the fan groups of those stars - brainless, fanatical, facts don't matter, and the brother is always right...

In fact, Trump, who has been deeply involved in the entertainment industry, and his team referred to the psychology of brain-dead fans when planning his candidacy.

Trump's supporters also show a resentful mentality. They resent the elite groups such as bankers, politicians, and corporate executives, and also resent more than They are poorer Mexican immigrants, blacks or Middle Eastern refugees.

This is normal. In a globalized and increasingly multicultural world, it is a common problem for relatively disadvantaged groups to hate those who are more disadvantaged than them, especially in areas with low education levels.

Just like the Weimar Republic, haters and fearers have no trust in mainstream political and economic institutions, so they follow leaders who promise the greatest destruction.

This does have something to do with education - not because higher education levels are immune to incitement, but because the poor education system makes too many people vulnerable.

Coupled with the increasing unemployment rate, the living standards of these people are also declining. They can't see any hope of improvement, so they just want to break everything. .....

The first to "revolt" are always the lower class people who can't survive, that's the truth.

Of course, the ones who finally get the fruits of victory will never be "them".

Just as Hillary and Trump continued to spit at each other, comments from all sides on the second debate also came out.

The major media have different views on which side has the upper hand. The only thing they have in common is that they all think "this debate is the ugliest campaign debate in the history of the United States. The personal attacks of Hillary and Trump throughout the debate have obscured the discussion of major policy issues."

For example, the famous Politico website commented: "In the 90-minute debate, Trump and Hillary called each other "liar" more than 23 times, "untrustworthy" more than 16 times, and "unworthy of being president" more than 11 times. The personal attacks on each other far outweighed the discussion of policy differences. The whole debate was simply "endless abuse and foul language" with no substance. ”

However, most media also believe that Hillary has not changed in this debate, while Trump has made great progress.

The Washington Post said: "In this debate, personal attacks accounted for a larger proportion, which is actually in favor of Trump, because Trump's brainIn fact, there are not many policy guidelines in the debate. Asking him to talk about policy details is embarrassing for him. Therefore, there is reason to believe that in this debate, Trump successfully pulled Hillary to the field he is good at, and finally gained the upper hand by 5.3. " The New York Times also said: "In the first debate a month ago, we can clearly see that Trump's performance was far inferior to Hillary, who has rich political experience, when it comes to policy, but the policy content of this debate was diluted by personal scandals, and Hillary did not play her advantages." The Wall Street Journal believes that: "From a tactical point of view, Trump's performance in the second round of debates was exactly the opposite of his first round of debates. In the first round of debates, Trump first tested and then defended, and finally lost control of Hillary's effective attack. In the second round of debates, Trump seized Bill Clinton's scandal from the beginning to attack Hillary, and then the email gate, one link after another. ”

(Brothers, please protect me, give me some comments, flowers, collections, and rewards. Thank you.)