To be honest, Trump's "historical personality" is too suitable for this kind of multi-person debate.

He became a "conspicuous person" who would interrupt any topic.

At the debate, Scalia, one of the nine justices of the US Supreme Court, died, which also caused controversy among Republican presidential candidates.

Trump shouted loudly: "For the appointment of justices, what we have to do is postpone! Postpone! Postpone!"

Except Jeb Bush, all other Republican candidates expressed their disagreement with Obama's nomination of Supreme Court justices.

Although Jeb did not think that President Obama could nominate a popular person, he still said on the field: "Nominating what kind of person to serve as a judge of the Supreme Court is within the president's authority."

But his words seemed a bit out of place.

……

The US presidential debate was drowned in spit.

England's Daily Telegraph commented on the "503" debate, saying that it was the "most verbally abusive debate" between Republican candidates so far, and many candidates lost their cool heads.

The Washington Post called this debate "the most vulgar verbal confrontation."

Although the US election has been repeatedly criticized by the outside world as a "war of words" between candidates.

But the verbal war in the 2016 election was surprisingly fierce.

Especially in several Republican debates where "big mouth" Trump was, the candidates attacked each other fiercely, and the criticism they received became more and more sharp.

The BBC commented: "This year's election process seems too gorgeous, but lacks rationality."

The New York Times commented: "Vulgar, mean, private and funny - so far in the 2016 election campaign, the playful election season has been hijacked by the "Twitter" war of words and the tug-of-war in the polls every day. The big perspective is easily obscured, and weirdness has become normal."

Although criticized by the media for "no bottom line", according to data released by market research organization Nielsen, this TV debate has become the most watched debate show in the US election in the past decade, with 13.51 million viewers, setting the highest ratings record so far.

CBS also said that the peak ratings of this debate fell from 10:00 to 10:30 local time, with a viewership of 14.63 million, and it is also the TV debate show with the most adults aged 25 to 54 watched this year.

The most interesting thing is that Trump, who spit on everyone in the debate show, was later looked down upon by most mainstream media, who believed that he was the loser of the debate because of his "vulgar" and "ignorant" nature.

But among ordinary Americans, Trump, who cursed everywhere, was talked about with great relish. Many people imitated his saying "You should let your mother run for election" - for example, in major talk shows, such as the NBA, "You should let your mother play basketball."

Obviously, this debate was not very good for Jeb Bush., he became a laughing stock and a "mama's boy".

Four days after the debate, on February 20, Jeb Bush announced that he would suspend his presidential campaign, and his dream of becoming the third "Bush President" in American history was shattered.

Last June, in sunny Miami, the former Florida governor officially announced his candidacy for the 2016 US presidential election.

He was once regarded as a popular candidate in the Republican Party, and American media predicted whether 2016 would be a showdown between the "Hillary Dynasty" and the "Bush Dynasty".

This year, Jeb suffered a disastrous defeat in three party primaries, and his support rate fell like a "Waterloo". It is impossible for Jeb to turn the tables, and continuing to run can only become a foil for others.

The Washington Post commented that Jeb's withdrawal from the election was "one of the most surprising failures in modern American political history."

Amidst the sighs, the outside world began to delve into the two main reasons why Jeb withdrew from the election and suffered a tragic defeat:

First, it was difficult for him to draw a clear line with the Bush family.

Second, he misjudged Trump, an important rival in the party.

Looking back at Jeb's three primary results - terrible.

In the first primary in Iowa on February 1, he ranked 6th, receiving only 2.8% of the votes; in the primary in New Hampshire, he ranked 4th, winning 7.9% of the votes; in the South Carolina primary, Jeb's election situation still did not improve, ranking 4th, receiving only 8.6% of the votes.

Relying on the strong influence of the "Bushi family", at the beginning of the campaign, his "aggressive" fundraising momentum swept all other Republican opponents.

According to a previous report by The Washington Post, Jeb raised $11.4 million within two weeks of announcing his candidacy for president, but small donations of $200 or less accounted for less than 3% of the total—that is, all his money came from consortiums and big capital.

The proportion of his huge personal donations ranks first among all Republican candidates, which shows that Jeb has the "strong support" of big consortiums behind him.

Unfortunately, Jeb did not turn the advantage of raising high campaign funds into an advantage in support rate...

His campaign funds do not bring "power", but only a kind of "helplessness".

When Martin saw this news, he could not help but snort coldly. The Texas consortium behind the "Bushi Family" does not get along with him. The competition between the two sides started as early as the presidency of Bush.

His support for Trump may not be without the intention of suppressing the Texas Group.

Since it is called the "Texas Group", it is better to stay in Texas. There is no need to run around the world.

The world belongs to me, and to the future "Super Meyers tycoon"!

In fact, Trump is not only Jeb's victim, but also the victim of the other four Republican candidates.

When he first announced his candidacy, almost 90% of people thought that Trump was just a runner-up, and he was just using the election platform to increase his influence.To increase his exposure, it is still for his business.

But no one expected that this "runner-up" would rise to prominence with his "extraordinary remarks" and "sharp style" from the beginning of his candidacy, and gradually won the favor of voters.

For all participants in this election, Trump is an unprecedented and unique opponent.

He would attack his opponents personally instead of having a serious policy debate, and he also used sharp remarks to monopolize media coverage - in the election-related reports, his provocative remarks occupied every page.

"Trump caused fear, despair and anxiety among voters, and he won votes because of this." Sally Bradshaw, chief consultant of Jeb's campaign team, commented, "It is really difficult to deal with Trump in a conservative way. Jeb is a 0.5 person who is not very angry, but voters want him to be angry, and he can't do it."

And his rival Cruz said directly: "Trump is a catfish. Everyone is not used to it and can only respond passively."

Now, the problem facing major campaign teams is how to deal with Trump.

Some campaign consultants advocate active response, even challenging Trump, to create an atmosphere of "one-on-one confrontation" with Trump.

Other campaign consultants hold opposing views, believing that Trump is just a "flash in the pan" and that Trump will not be able to hold on for long and then withdraw from the election.

Some consultants even use "Don't lock yourself in a pigpen and fight with pigs" to warn their employers.

"So, how will you deal with this idiot?" Clinton asked Hillary.

(Brothers, please protect me, give me some comments, flowers, collections, and rewards, thank you.) .

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like