Empire: God System

Sonia's attitude towards this cooperation is actually similar to Luther's. She is also semi-active and semi-passive. The active point is that she is very aware of Arthur's abilities. His skills and abilities can indeed help her achieve results. He is the kind of person who can do a lot in everything.

If the cooperation with him can proceed normally, Sonia will be able to achieve a lot.

But that's the problem. It seems that the cooperation between the two parties is not progressing well.

The other party is not a simple, pure collaborator. The background of this collaborator is really exaggerated. He even planted a traitor in his organization without knowing when. Such a person cannot really cooperate sincerely, right?

And the vast majority of relationships that fail to cooperate sincerely will have less than pleasant consequences in the end.

If she had a choice, then of course Sonia would not want to continue to cooperate, but on the one hand, she did not dare to bet on what the organization behind Arthur would do after she refused to cooperate. Sonia's father may not be able to deal with it, and even the empire may not be able to deal with it. On the one hand, she does see the benefits that can be obtained by cooperating with Arthur.

Compared with cooperation, the relationship between the two parties currently looks more like a state of mutual utilization.

When both parties do not trust each other and both parties clearly know that the other party is not worthy of trust, actively seeking help from the other party is tantamount to showing weakness. In such a cooperative relationship of mutual distrust, showing weakness is tantamount to setting the stage for one's own failure. Foreshadowing, maybe even death.

The relationship of mutual utilization is like two extremely ferocious but hungry carnivores walking together. The prerequisite for being able to walk together is that neither side can do anything about the other for the time being. In this case, it is better to cooperate and do things together. In this way, the two can hunt. Kill stronger prey and the hunting list will become wider.

But in the process, if either one of the two beasts is injured, the other one will naturally not refuse to eat its fellow traveler. provide help? Don't think about it, he will be the first to show his teeth at you when you are at a slight disadvantage!

The mutual utilization relationship in human society is not as straightforward as the above example, but the core is the same.

The premise of this relationship of mutual utilization is that both parties have equal strength, and no one can take advantage of the other. Otherwise, the so-called mutual utilization will only become one-sided utilization, and the other party will suffer a pure loss until one party takes the other party. Squeeze it dry and eat it.

The cooperation between Arthur and Sonia feels almost like this. If Sonia makes their own judgment, they are even at a slight disadvantage.

Judging from the perspective of the Quaker gang, the two organizations are indeed not equal from the perspective of strength. The dark side organization behind Arthur is capable of directly destroying the Quaker gang, but it is just for the sake of concealment. , the dark side organization would not do this without provoking the imperial military.

The Quaker gang did not dare to disclose the information of the dark side organization to the imperial military casually, because on the one hand, they were afraid that the information would not be disclosed due to the existence of the traitor, and on the other hand, they were also afraid that the information would be leaked. After that, the dark side was angered. What if the dark side really killed them directly?

Of course, I have to add something here. Not to mention the Quaker gang, even the empire does not know the title of the dark side. They just have to write"that mysterious and powerful secret organization" every time. This is really It was too verbose, so the author just used the title Dark Side, which is simple and convenient.

Having said that, Sonia and Arthur are currently intimidating each other, and then using each other while intimidating.

From this point of view, the relationship between the two parties can even be called hostile.

Therefore, in Luther's opinion, Sonia would not ask him for help unless she had to.

But it is actually not very reasonable to say that Sonia has collected some decisive information and is preparing to confront herself or even take action against herself.

Even if Sonia had collected some of her information, she would not be able to get any benefits from the negotiation with herself when the traitor embedded in the Quirk gang could not determine the specific situation..

As for the traitor, without corresponding prerequisite information, Sonia has no chance to find the traitor. After all, the traitor does not exist, so there are no corresponding flaws and traces. In such a short time, Luther really didn't believe that Nesonya could find the traitor.

So since she won't ask for help from herself, and most likely won't confront her in a hostile state, in this case, what kind of content will Sonia need to talk to herself in person?